traingle logo

2023-24 Tools Competition

Preparing for the 21st Century World

 

Finalists for this track have been announced. Learn more here.

Access Rubric
View Judges

Phase III results were released on April 4, 2024. For Phase II competitors, please contact our team at ToolsCompetition@the-learning-agency.com if you would like to receive feedback on your Phase II proposal. 


Happy african american school girl making a solar system for a s
traingle logo

Learn About the Track

Track Description

Tools that increase the relevance of instruction to build 21st century skills and prepare students to navigate the changing world. Competitors in this track may propose solutions that support students to master subjects relevant to the modern economy, develop durable skills, and plan for their futures.

This track aims to support students in getting “life-ready,” with the skills that are in demand by the changing world and competencies necessary to achieve big goals. Solutions will help students process information, tackle problems, make decisions, and work together. 


This may include, but is not limited to, tools that:

  • Target in-demand subjects such as computer programming, data science, artificial intelligence, and media literacy
  • Foster critical thinking, problem solving, and collaboration
  • Build leadership, communication, productivity, and leadership skills
  • Explore post-secondary pathways and ensure career readiness

21st century skills have become essential to remaining adaptive as the demands of the economy are ever-changing and the information age requires us to consume and apply knowledge in new and creative ways. Beyond core content areas, students must develop literacy skills in information, technology, and the media to keep pace. From the early childhood level, a focus on social-emotional and other durable skills has a positive impact on academic achievement. At the job level, according to a McKinsey report, companies are increasingly prioritizing social-emotional, advanced cognitive, and digital literacy skillsets in the workplace. We need more tools to cultivate these skillsets in learners at all levels.

Competitive tools should facilitate continuous data collection and support research insights on factors affecting learning outcomes for diverse student populations and learning conditions.

Target User/Audience

Tools should target Pre-K through secondary learners or educators as the primary user group.

Who should submit?

Competitors worldwide are invited to submit (see the official rules for any restrictions). We welcome proposals from teams or individuals from all backgrounds, including edtech companies, researchers/universities, educators, or students (undergraduate or graduate).

Competitive Priorities

Based on the most pressing needs in learning and learning technologies, a subset of awards will be reserved for tools that:
  • Leverage Generative AI or large language models

Examples

While the Tools Competition has different tracks and competitive priorities from year to year, the winning tools below are examples of what would be considered compelling for the Preparing for the 21st Century World track in this year’s competition.
code kit logo
Ocobox

Catalyst Award

Reach logo
REACH College and Career Pathways

Growth Award

tilli logo
Tilli

Growth Award

r logo
RecapCS

Catalyst Award

Bertrand Schneider
Multimodal Toolkit

Catalyst Award

Peer Assisted Learning SystemsCatalyst Award
Peer Assisted Learning Systems

Catalyst Award

Judges

Tools Competition judges play a critical role in selecting Tools Competition Winners and bring expertise spanning philanthropy, research, industry, and education. Judges will hear virtual pitches from finalists in Phase III of the competition.

Speaker Image

Christopher Bezsylko

Head of School
Imagination Lab School
Speaker Image

Kevin Bromer

ED Head of Technology & Data Strategy
Ballmer Group
Speaker Image

Ali Chin

Grantmaking Manager
Siegel Family Endowment
Speaker Image

Nick Ehrmann

Managing Director, Impact
Arena Holdings
Speaker Image

Josh Elder

Vice President & Head of Grantmaking
Siegel Family Endowment
Speaker Image

Giovana Espejo

Program Officer
Schultz Family Foundation
Speaker Image

Hannah Ferris

Secondary Teacher
Dallas ISD
Speaker Image

Barbara Glover

Programme Officer: APET
AUDA-NEPAD
Speaker Image

Henry Hipps

CEO
Diffusion Venture Studio
Speaker Image

Sarah Holloway

Faculty, Senior Fellow for Social Impact
Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA)
Speaker Image

Tanya Howden

Founder & Educator
Lassies in STEM
Speaker Image

David Hylden

Co-Founding Partner
Prevail Fund
Speaker Image

Doug Jaffe

Co-Founder
Coherence Fund
Speaker Image

Jared Joiner

Director, Education Practice to Product
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
Speaker Image

Asyia Kazmi, OBE

Global Education Policy Lead
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Speaker Image

Rubayat Khan

Entrepreneur in Residence
Endless Network
Speaker Image

Alex Nawar

Social Impact Partnerships
OpenAI
Speaker Image

Rebecca Novak

Director, K-12 Education and Data Science
Valhalla Foundation
Speaker Image

Frank Odayo

Curriculum Development & Implementation Consultant
Speaker Image

Kevin O’Neil

Managing Director, New Frontiers
The Rockefeller Foundation
Speaker Image

Daniel Sacks

Consultant & Advisor
Speaker Image

Ben Shapiro

Assistant Professor
Georgia State University
Speaker Image

Kristen Silvas

Instructional Designer/Educator
Quality School International Astana
Speaker Image

LaVerne Srinivasan

Vice President, National Program and Program Director, Education
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Speaker Image

Chéla Wallace

STEM Education Leader/Education Consultant
KIPP NYC/Independent Consultant
Speaker Image

John Whitmer

Senior Fellow
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education

Compete in this Track

1. Select your award level

When submitting a proposal, competitors must select the relevant award level based on the size and scale of their tool. Proposals at all award levels should detail how the proposed tool will solve a defined problem, rather than focus on past achievements.
catalyst

Catalyst Level Awards: $50,000

These awards are designed for early-stage competitors.
  • Tool requirement : For competitors with an idea but no existing tool, the proposal must detail how funding will be used to develop the tool. For competitors with an early-stage tool, the proposal must detail how funding will be used to add a new feature or element to the existing tool or to enhance and improve effectiveness.
  • User requirement : There is no minimum number of users required at this level. Competitors may submit with a great idea or early stage tool.
  • Research requirement : There is no research requirement at this level. Evaluators look for an understanding of the tools’ potential to contribute to learning science research broadly and the intention of the team to support external researchers through data-sharing, partnerships, or instrumentation.
growth

Growth Level Awards: $150,000

These awards are designed for competitors with a tool with some users and scale.
  • Tool requirement : Proposals must detail how the funding will be used to add a new feature or element to the existing tool or to enhance and improve effectiveness.
  • User requirement : The tool should have active users at the time of submission. Most tools competitive for this phase have already gone to market.
  • Research requirement : Teams are required to demonstrate a commitment to learning science research. In the Phase II proposal, this will include a plan to support external researchers at scale, which may include data-sharing, research partnerships, and instrumentation of the tool for research.
transform

Transform Level Awards : $300,000

These awards are designed for advanced competitors with an established tool.
  • Tool requirement : Proposals must detail how the funding will be used to add a new feature or element to the existing tool or to enhance and improve effectiveness.
  • User requirement : The tool should have at least 10,000 users at the time of submission.
  • Research requirement : Teams are required to demonstrate a commitment to learning science research. In the Phase II proposal, this will include a plan to support external researchers at scale, which may include data-sharing, research partnerships, and instrumentation of the tool for research.

2. Apply for the OpenAI Learning Impact Prize

Determine whether you are eligible to apply for the OpenAI Learning Impact Prize (optional).

OpenAI Learning Impact Prize
In partnership with OpenAI, the Tools Competition is thrilled to offer the OpenAI Learning Impact Prize to catalyze the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on learning outcomes and drive edtech innovation leveraging advanced computational methods.

OpenAI will select up to three recipients of the OpenAI Learning Impact Prize among competition winners who will receive $100,000 in additional funds, $10,000 in OpenAI API credits, and technical guidance from OpenAI engineers. Select contenders will also receive $2,500 in OpenAI API credits.

Given the rise of ChatGPT and growing interest in the possibilities of AI in educational settings, the 2023-24 competition is especially interested in supporting teams that are exploring, testing, or using AI-enabled tools and services to impact learning.

Competitors across all tracks that indicate an interest in being considered for this award will complete additional requirements when submitting their proposal materials. 

traingle logo

Proposals will be evaluated for the following criteria

 

1

Novelty of the tool
and technology

 

2

Potential impact and likelihood to improve learning

 

3

Attention to equity to support learning of historically marginalized populations

 

4

Demand from learners, families, and educators

 

5

Ability to support learning engineering

 

6

Ability to scale to additional users and/or domains

left-bottom-vector
traingle logo

What is a Tool?

The Tools Competition funds edtech tools and technologies that support learning outcomes and can contribute to learning science research.

Eligible tools have the potential to generate novel learning data that researchers can study to better understand learning at scale. This may include an app, software, algorithm, or other digital technology that facilitates or supports continuous data collection and has the potential to scale at minimal cost.

Please note that this definition is not exhaustive. As technology continues to develop and innovations are created globally, other tool concepts may also be competitive.

Not sure your tool is eligible? Explore winning tools from previous years or get in touch.

Timeline

  • November 10 2023

    Deadline for Phase I
    Abstracts
    Competitors submit a 750-word abstract describing the concept for their tool and responding to the evaluation criteria.
  • December 8 2023

    Select competitors invited
    to Phase II
  • February 2 2024

    Deadline for Phase II
    Proposals
    Competitors develop a 3,000-word proposal and budget detailing their tool and its technology and responding in detail to the evaluation criteria. Rubrics will be posted when Phase II opens.
  • April 2024

    Finalists invited to Phase III
    pitches
  • April-May 2024

    Phase III Pitches (virtual)
    Finalists pitch before a panel of expert judges and have the opportunity for support and feedback in crafting their pitch.
  • June 2024

    Winners Announced
    Winners are announced and receive the first installment of their award. Winners receive coaching, the opportunity to connect with leaders in the field, and the ability to present to researchers or to refine their tool.
  • Year Following the
    Competition

    Winner Impact Study
    All winners will work with Georgia State University during the year following the competition to define impact measures for their tool and set up processes for ongoing data collection and evaluation.
  • December 2024

    Product Review Day
    Winners present on their progress to date and receive feedback from other winners and leaders in the field. Progress is considered against winner’s proposal and receive the second installment of their award after Product Review Day.

Timeline

September 21, 2023
Competition Launch
November 10, 2023
Deadline for Phase I Abstracts

Competitors submit an abstract describing the concept for their tool and responding to the evaluation criteria.

December 8, 2023
Select competitors invited to Phase II
February 2, 2024
Deadline for Phase II Proposals

Competitors develop a proposal and budget detailing their tool and its technology and responding in detail to the evaluation criteria. Rubrics will be posted when Phase II opens.

April 2024
Finalists invited to Phase III pitches
April-May 2024
Phase III Pitches (virtual)
Finalists pitch before a panel of expert judges and have the opportunity for support and feedback in crafting their pitch.
June 2024
Winners Announced
Winners are announced and receive the first installment of their award. Winners receive coaching, the opportunity to connect with leaders in the field, and the ability to present to researchers or to refine their tool.
Year Following the Competition - Winner Impact Study
All winners will work with Georgia State University during the year following the competition to define impact measures for their tool and set up processes for ongoing data collection and evaluation.
December 2024
Product Review Day
Winners present on their progress to date and receive feedback from other winners and leaders in the field. Progress is considered against winner’s proposal and receive the second installment of their award after Product Review Day.
traingle logo

Explore a Different Track

Phase III results for the Building an Adaptive & Competitive Workforce track will be released in late May. Meet the finalists for all other tracks here.